Manage Generated Test Files
Understand where generated feature and Playwright files live and when to regenerate or edit them.
Last updated
Was this helpful?
Understand where generated feature and Playwright files live and when to regenerate or edit them.
TestVibe stores test intent and generated automation in your project.
Feature files are the readable source of truth. Generated Playwright files are the executable output.
TestVibe keeps two code corpora apart, and this page is only about one of them:
Test Files
This project's own features, groups, and generated Playwright specs/configs — everything covered on this page.
Lives in this TestVibe project; optionally mirrored two-way to a Git repo via Settings → Test Files Sync.
App Code
The application under test's own source — read-only. TestVibe reads it to ground AI generation and map coverage.
A separate repository connected via Settings → App Repository; browsed in the App Code section of the app.
Don't confuse the two: connecting an App Repository does not put your test files in that repo, and Test Files Sync does not give TestVibe write access to your application's source.
.feature
Readable Gherkin test intent.
.js or .ts Playwright test
Generated browser automation that can be run.
Playwright configuration
Browser, viewport, reporter, and execution settings.
TestVibe settings
Project defaults such as framework, agent, and configuration.
Most users should edit .feature files first and let TestVibe generate the Playwright code.
Feature files usually live under Features/.
Example structure:
Your project may use .ts instead of .js depending on project setup.
Group and feature names influence project file paths.
Create group Auth
Creates or uses Features/Auth/.
Add feature Login in Auth
Creates Features/Auth/Login.feature.
Rename feature
Renames the feature file.
Move feature
Moves the feature file to another group folder.
Generate code
Creates or updates the Playwright file associated with the feature.
Use clear names early. Renaming later is supported when available, but it changes project file paths.
The behavior changed
Edit the .feature file and regenerate.
The expected outcome changed
Edit the .feature file and regenerate.
The generated code has a small selector issue
Edit code or improve Gherkin and regenerate.
The code uses the wrong journey
Improve the Gherkin and regenerate.
The test uses a shared helper
Edit generated code if your team owns that pattern.
Regeneration may replace manual code changes. If you manually edit generated code, make sure your team knows which changes should be preserved.
Keep feature names aligned with user behavior.
Keep generated files near their source feature when possible.
Review generated code before relying on it for important flows.
Run one test after generation before running a whole group.
Update Gherkin when product behavior changes.
Check:
the selected project
whether generation completed successfully
whether the feature is under the expected group
whether the generated code tab is available for the selected feature
whether the run completed before saving generated output
See Troubleshoot failed generation if generation did not finish.
Last updated
Was this helpful?
Was this helpful?
Features/
Auth/
Login.feature
Login.js
Billing/
DownloadInvoice.feature
DownloadInvoice.js
Configurations/
Default.config.js